CFTC Division of Enforcement Issues New Cooperation Policy

The CFTC’s Division of Enforcement has issued a significant new policy on cooperation that reshapes how self-reporting, cooperation, and remediation will affect enforcement outcomes. The May 19, 2026 Staff Advisory replaces prior guidance and, for the first time, creates a defined framework for when the Division may decline to recommend an enforcement action altogether.

The policy establishes detailed criteria for declinations, including prompt voluntary self-reporting, full cooperation, timely remediation, and restitution or disgorgement, while also introducing structured penalty reduction tiers of up to 75% for parties that cooperate even if they do not qualify for a declination. At the same time, the guidance raises the stakes on timing, requiring parties to report misconduct “at the earliest possible opportunity.”

The new internal guidance provides important insight into how the Division intends to exercise prosecutorial discretion and will have significant implications for firms evaluating potential misconduct, internal investigations, and disclosure decisions. Read the full Sidley post for a detailed analysis of the policy’s requirements, cooperation credit framework, and practical considerations for market participants. The CFTC press release can be found here.

(more…)

DOJ Announces Accelerated Review of FCA Qui Tams Alleging Fraud Against State-Administered Benefits Programs

It is not business as usual at DOJ.  In the latest announcement related to the Department’s efforts to fight alleged fraud, on May 27, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate issued a memorandum directing DOJ’s Civil Division and U.S. Attorneys’ Offices to accelerate the review of qui tams alleging fraud against federally funded state-administered benefits programs, including programs involving housing, food assistance, medical care, and cash assistance.   The memorandum, titled “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in Benefits Fraud Matters,” implements President Trump’s March 2026 Executive Order establishing the “Task Force to Eliminate Fraud,” which we reported on here, and which directed the Department to take appropriate action to promote “meritorious” qui tams and to complete investigations sooner, including within the 60-day statutory period.

DOJ and Texas AG Announce First Settlement in National Investigation of Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

On May 15, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice and the Texas Attorney General announced the first publicly disclosed settlement arising from the federal government’s nationwide investigation into gender-affirming care for minors. The resolution with Texas Children’s Hospital reflects a coordinated federal-state enforcement approach grounded in False Claims Act (“FCA”) and Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) theories, alongside significant non-monetary remedies extending beyond traditional healthcare fraud settlements. In addition to a substantial monetary payment, the agreements impose operational, clinical, and governance-related obligations that may signal how enforcement authorities intend to pursue similar matters going forward.

This blog post examines the settlement terms, the broader federal policy and enforcement framework underlying the investigation, and the implications for healthcare providers and life sciences companies navigating areas of aligned federal and state enforcement focus. Click to read more about the resolution and what it may signal for future DOJ and state attorney general enforcement activity.

Back Before the Fifth Circuit: DOJ Appeals Another FCPA Acquittal

On May 8, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice appealed Judge Kenneth Hoyt’s post-verdict acquittal in the FCPA prosecution of Ramón Alexandro Rovirosa Martínez, setting up what could become a significant Fifth Circuit decision on both double jeopardy and the use of translated foreign language evidence in federal criminal trials.

Although a Houston jury convicted Rovirosa in December 2025 on conspiracy and substantive FCPA charges tied to alleged bribery of officials at Mexico’s state-owned oil company, Pemex, Judge Hoyt later vacated the convictions, concluding that the Government’s reliance on certified English translations of Spanish language communications violated the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause because the translators themselves did not testify.

The appeal raises potentially consequential questions about whether post-verdict acquittals can be reviewed without violating double jeopardy protections, and whether certified translations of foreign language communications are “testimonial” statements requiring live confrontation. This blog post explores those issues and places the appeal in the broader context of the Fifth Circuit’s continuing scrutiny of major FCPA decisions.

English Privilege Ruling Carries Important Lessons for Internal Investigations

A recent English High Court decision could significantly affect how companies structure internal investigations and legal communications under English law. In Aabar Holdings v. Glencore, the court held that certain internal corporate communications created for the purpose of obtaining legal advice may be protected by legal advice privilege even where no lawyer is directly involved in the communication. The decision provides important clarification on the scope of English legal privilege, particularly for multinational companies navigating cross-border investigations and compliance reviews, while also underscoring the continued importance of carefully defining the corporate “client group” when seeking legal advice.

(more…)

Supreme Court’s First Choice Decision May Expand Federal Court Options to Recipients of State Attorney General CIDs

The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport may create a new strategic consideration for recipients of state attorney general civil investigative demands (CIDs). In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that a nonprofit could pursue a Section 1983 challenge to a New Jersey Attorney General subpoena in federal court based on alleged First Amendment associational harms arising from compelled donor disclosure.

Although the Court emphasized the narrow nature of its holding, the decision potentially opens the door to federal court challenges where state attorney general CIDs implicate donor anonymity, expressive association, advocacy activities, or other constitutional interests. The ruling also reflects the Court’s continued willingness to recognize Article III standing based on alleged chilling effects tied to First Amendment rights.

Our latest post examines the decision, the arguments raised by a coalition of state attorneys general, and what the ruling may mean for companies, nonprofits, trade associations, and other recipients of state attorney general investigative demands.

SEC Rescinds Its Gag Rule Policy

The SEC yesterday rescinded its so-called gag rule policy prohibiting parties from denying the allegations in no admit/no deny settlements. The SEC also announced it would not enforce gag rule provisions in existing settlements (which it pointed out was not enforced previously). Even with this policy change, the SEC can still agree to no admit/no deny settlements, and it noted that it may continue to require admissions in some cases.

The practical effects of this policy change remain uncertain, but we can predict at least two possible consequences despite the fact that this will be a welcome change for some settling parties. First, the SEC staff may seek to include more detailed allegations in settled orders to make it more difficult for settling parties to deny the allegations. Second, some settling parties have viewed the gag rule as helpful because it constrained their public statements after a settlement. Without the ability to rely on the “no deny” language, those parties may now face pressure to say more, which could introduce new risks.

(more…)

Tariff Enforcement at the Forefront: Importer Agrees to Pay $549.5 million in Largest-Ever Trade-Related False Claims Act Settlement

On May 12, 2026, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a $549.5 million settlement with Perfectus Aluminum Acquisitions LLC and four affiliated companies to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by evading customs duties. This settlement is the largest trade-related settlement under the FCA.

The action was initiated by qui tam cases brought by individuals who worked for U.S.-based competitors and the Aluminum Extrusion Counsel and ultimately coordinated through the DOJ’s Trade Fraud Task Force, which involved cooperation between DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security. This case highlights the increasing use of the FCA to hold importers liable for the underpayment of customs duties, the Administration’s commitment to enforcing U.S. customs laws, and the potential for competitors and former employees to harness the FCA to motivate federal investigations into allegations of trade fraud.

This post examines the settlement and discusses its implications for importers, manufacturers, and other companies facing customs and trade enforcement risk.

Categories

Archives

Meet the Team

<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/a/axel-douglas-a">Douglas A. Axel</a>

Douglas A. Axel

Los Angeles
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/l/loughnane-joan-m">Joan M. Loughnane</a>

Joan M. Loughnane

New York
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/p/polite-jr-kenneth-a">Kenneth A. Polite Jr.</a>

Kenneth A. Polite Jr.

Washington, D.C., New York
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/t/tham-yuet-ming">Yuet Ming Tham</a>

Yuet Ming Tham

Singapore, Hong Kong
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/a/anderson-dave">Dave Anderson</a>

Dave Anderson

San Francisco
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/a/armbrust-sheila-a-g">Sheila A.G. Armbrust</a>

Sheila A.G. Armbrust

San Francisco
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/c/cooper-ellyce-r">Ellyce R. Cooper</a>

Ellyce R. Cooper

Century City
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/c/craig-daniel-c">Daniel C. Craig</a>

Daniel C. Craig

Chicago
<a target=‘_blank’ href="">Alexandria Daugherty</a>

Alexandria Daugherty

Los Angeles
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/d/dukin-craig-francis">Craig Francis Dukin</a>

Craig Francis Dukin

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/g/george-sara">Sara George</a>

Sara George

London
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/h/ho-shu-min">Shu Min Ho</a>

Shu Min Ho

Singapore
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/i/igra-naomi-a">Naomi A. Igra</a>

Naomi A. Igra

San Francisco
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/k/koehler-kristin-graham">Kristin Graham Koehler</a>

Kristin Graham Koehler

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/l/lassar-scott-r">Scott R. Lassar</a>

Scott R. Lassar

Chicago
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/l/levy-michael-a">Michael A. Levy</a>

Michael A. Levy

New York

<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/m/malhotra-geeta">Geeta Malhotra</a>

Geeta Malhotra

Chicago
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/m/mann-michael-d">Michael D. Mann</a>

Michael D. Mann

New York
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/m/mcginley-ian">Ian McGinley</a>

Ian McGinley

New York
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/m/miller-lisa-h">Lisa H. Miller</a>

Lisa H. Miller

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/m/mirabella-julia-g">Julia G. Mirabella</a>

Julia G. Mirabella

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/o/ono-takayuki">Takayuki Ono</a>

Takayuki Ono

Chicago, Tokyo
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/p/poletto-alexa">Alexa Poletto</a>

Alexa Poletto

New York
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/p/popp-karen-a">Karen A. Popp</a>

Karen A. Popp

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/p/pruitt-jacqueline">Jacqueline Pruitt</a>

Jacqueline Pruitt

Chicago
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/r/rachal-doreen-m">Doreen M. Rachal</a>

Doreen M. Rachal

New York, Boston

<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/r/rubino-kevin-r">Kevin Rubino</a>

Kevin Rubino

San Francisco
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/s/shubert-leslie-a">Leslie A. Shubert</a>

Leslie A. Shubert

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/s/silva-david-a">David A. Silva</a>

David A. Silva

Singapore
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/t/tagliaferri-michele">Michele Tagliaferri</a>

Michele Tagliaferri

Brussels
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/v/volpe-frank-r">Frank R. Volpe</a>

Frank R. Volpe

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/w/west-marisa-s">Marisa S. West</a>

Marisa S. West

Washington, D.C.
<a target=‘_blank’ href="https://www.sidley.com/en/people/x/xenakis-angela-m">Angela M. Xenakis</a>

Angela M. Xenakis

Washington, D.C.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

SUBSCRIBE

To receive email alerts when we post a blog entry, please provide your name and email address.