On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (NDIL) announced a new Individual Self-Disclosure Program offering qualifying individuals three potential forms of relief in exchange for voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation: letter immunity, a deferred or non-prosecution agreement, or criminal prosecution with substantial sentencing relief. The Program’s express three-tier structure distinguishes it from many other federal self-disclosure programs, which generally focus on the possibility of a non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreement. To qualify, individuals must provide a complete and truthful proffer, cooperate fully with law enforcement, testify if required, and disgorge any criminal proceeds, among other requirements. This post summarizes the Program’s key features and highlights how it compares to similar self-disclosure initiatives adopted in other jurisdictions.
http://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00Takayuki Onohttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngTakayuki Ono2026-05-15 15:27:402026-05-15 15:28:57Three Potential Benefits, One Powerful Incentive: NDIL’s New Individual Self-Disclosure Program
New SEC Enforcement Director David Woodcock used his first public remarks to signal continuity with Chairman Paul Atkins’s “back to basics” agenda, emphasizing “quality over quantity” and a focus on cases involving real investor harm rather than technical violations. Woodcock identified key enforcement priorities and announced reinstitution of the Retail Fraud Working Group to focus specifically on protecting retail investors.
http://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00Ike Adamshttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngIke Adams2026-05-14 11:12:202026-05-14 11:12:21New U.S. SEC Enforcement Director David Woodcock Signals Continued “Back to Basics” Approach
As companies increasingly integrate generative and agentic AI into core business functions, a May 7, 2026 decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York1 highlights several fundamental guardrails for corporate legal and compliance departments to consider. Although the case arose in the context of government decision-making, the opinion carries broader implications for any entity that embeds generative AI in its processes.
http://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00David A. Gordonhttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngDavid A. Gordon2026-05-13 09:04:432026-05-12 17:10:52When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY Decision
On May 7, 2026, Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva used his first major speech to the compliance community since DOJ’s March 2026 rollout of its department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) to deliver a clear message: corporate enforcement activity is expected to increase, companies should self-disclose misconduct early—even before completing internal investigations—and robust compliance programs remain central to DOJ’s expectations.
President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order on May 1, 2026, establishing a new U.S. sanctions program targeting Cuba that supplements existing sanctions. The Order gives the U.S. Secretaries of State and Treasury the authority to impose sanctions on non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, for engaging in certain activities in Cuba or involving sanctioned Cuban persons. It thus creates significant new risks for non-U.S. persons with respect to dealings in or involving Cuba.
http://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00Maura Rezendeshttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngMaura Rezendes2026-05-11 11:31:132026-05-11 11:31:13United States Announces New Cuba-Related Sanctions Program
On April 23, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) announced parallel criminal and civil actions against a U.S. Army service member accused of using classified military information about a planned operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to place profitable trades on Polymarket, a prediction market platform. The case, the first to apply traditional insider trading and fraud theories to prediction markets, signals a shift in how the government will regulate this emerging market. In response to this news, companies should consider reviewing company policies on insider trading and compliance to address prediction markets and the use of confidential information in connection with event-based trading.
https://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/02/GettyImages-1307247030.jpg400600Matthew Podolskyhttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngMatthew Podolsky2026-05-08 15:27:102026-05-12 11:55:55The First Prediction Market Insider Trading Case: SDNY and CFTC Test the Limits of Fraud and Commodities Law
On April 30, 2026, the Department of Justice’s Civil Division announced the Fraud Oversight through Careful Use of Statistics, or FOCUS, initiative. The initiative is aimed at a fast-growing category of False Claims Act relators that exploded in the aftermath of the pandemic and the Paycheck Protection Program: “data miners” who analyze publicly available government data to identify potential fraud and then file qui tam complaints. DOJ’s message to these non-traditional relators is twofold. First, the Department seems to have accepted that data-miner relators are here to stay, and so has invited sophisticated, well-supported data analysis that can help identify fraud that might otherwise go undetected. But second, DOJ intends to prioritize data-miner relators who can demonstrate meaningful pre-filing diligence, analytical rigor, familiarity with the governing program rules, and legally sufficient allegations.
For companies in sectors with substantial government funding or reimbursement, including healthcare, life sciences, defense, education, technology, and other government contractors, the practical takeaway is straightforward. Companies should evaluate their own publicly available data with the same skepticism and sophistication that a relator, short seller, or agency analyst might apply. Leveraging enhanced analytics and AI to match and front-run potential data miner-driven qui tams will allow companies to quickly assess the likely source of government interest, and explain it.
http://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.png00Michael D. Mannhttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngMichael D. Mann2026-05-07 15:47:382026-05-11 10:29:08DOJ’s FOCUS Initiative: An Invitation or a Warning to Data Miner Relators?
On April 21, 2026, a Ninth Circuit panel vacated an insider trading conviction in United States v. Bolandian, holding that the trial court failed to properly investigate a juror who admitted he was “not sure” he could remain impartial. The case involved a Los Angeles trader accused of profiting from confidential merger tips, resulting in a conviction and 24-month sentence. But on appeal, the court found plain error in allowing the uncertain juror—who ultimately served as foreperson—to remain without further inquiry. Emphasizing the court’s independent duty to ensure juror impartiality, the decision underscores that even without a defense objection, unresolved bias concerns can mandate a new trial—offering both a cautionary note and a safeguard for defense counsel.
https://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/05/MN-18360_Updated-Enhanced-Scrutiny-Blog-imagery_833x606_32.jpg606833Lisa H. Millerhttp://whitecollarwatch.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2026/03/sidleyLogo-e1643922598198.pngLisa H. Miller2026-05-06 09:50:302026-05-07 15:49:10Ninth Circuit Vacates Insider Trading Conviction Over Court’s Failure to Investigate Juror Bias
Three Potential Benefits, One Powerful Incentive: NDIL’s New Individual Self-Disclosure Program
On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (NDIL) announced a new Individual Self-Disclosure Program offering qualifying individuals three potential forms of relief in exchange for voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation: letter immunity, a deferred or non-prosecution agreement, or criminal prosecution with substantial sentencing relief. The Program’s express three-tier structure distinguishes it from many other federal self-disclosure programs, which generally focus on the possibility of a non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreement. To qualify, individuals must provide a complete and truthful proffer, cooperate fully with law enforcement, testify if required, and disgorge any criminal proceeds, among other requirements. This post summarizes the Program’s key features and highlights how it compares to similar self-disclosure initiatives adopted in other jurisdictions.
Takayuki Ono
Chicago, Tokyo
tono@sidley.com
David H. Hoffman
Chicago
david.hoffman@sidley.com
Daniel D. Rubinstein
Chicago
drubinstein@sidley.com
Geeta Malhotra
Chicago
gmalhotra@sidley.com
Daniel C. Craig
Chicago
dcraig@sidley.com
Desiree Mitchell
Chicago
desiree.mitchell@sidley.com
New U.S. SEC Enforcement Director David Woodcock Signals Continued “Back to Basics” Approach
New SEC Enforcement Director David Woodcock used his first public remarks to signal continuity with Chairman Paul Atkins’s “back to basics” agenda, emphasizing “quality over quantity” and a focus on cases involving real investor harm rather than technical violations. Woodcock identified key enforcement priorities and announced reinstitution of the Retail Fraud Working Group to focus specifically on protecting retail investors.
Ike Adams
Washington, D.C.
iadams@sidley.com
Kathryn L. Alessi
Boston
kalessi@sidley.com
W. Hardy Callcott
San Francisco
wcallcott@sidley.com
Kevin J. Campion
Washington, D.C.
kcampion@sidley.com
Stephen L. Cohen
Washington, D.C., Boston, ...
scohen@sidley.com
Ranah Esmaili
Washington, D.C., New York
resmaili@sidley.com
Kenyon Hall
Boston
kenyon.hall@sidley.com
Elizabeth A. Marino
Boston
emarino@sidley.com
Ian McGinley
New York
ian.mcginley@sidley.com
Lara Mehraban
New York
lmehraban@sidley.com
Christopher R. Mills
Washington, D.C.
cmills@sidley.com
David S. Petron
Washington, D.C.
dpetron@sidley.com
John I. Sakhleh
Washington, D.C.
jsakhleh@sidley.com
Charles A. Sommers
Washington, D.C.
csommers@sidley.com
Simona K. Suh
New York
simona.suh@sidley.com
Corin R. Swift
New York, Boston
corin.swift@sidley.com
Lara C. Thyagarajan
New York, Boston
lthyagarajan@sidley.com
Paul M. Tyrrell
Boston
ptyrrell@sidley.com
When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY Decision
As companies increasingly integrate generative and agentic AI into core business functions, a May 7, 2026 decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York1 highlights several fundamental guardrails for corporate legal and compliance departments to consider. Although the case arose in the context of government decision-making, the opinion carries broader implications for any entity that embeds generative AI in its processes.
(more…)
David A. Gordon
Chicago
dgordon@sidley.com
Takayuki Ono
Chicago, Tokyo
tono@sidley.com
Matt S. Jackson
Chicago
matthew.jackson@sidley.com
Daniel Lim
Washington, D.C.
daniel.lim@sidley.com
Kseniya K. Belysheva
Los Angeles
kbelysheva@sidley.com
“Don’t Wait”: DOJ Criminal Division Chief Signals Faster Disclosure Expectations and Uptick in Corporate Enforcement
On May 7, 2026, Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva used his first major speech to the compliance community since DOJ’s March 2026 rollout of its department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) to deliver a clear message: corporate enforcement activity is expected to increase, companies should self-disclose misconduct early—even before completing internal investigations—and robust compliance programs remain central to DOJ’s expectations.
Michael D. Mann
New York
mdmann@sidley.com
Lisa H. Miller
Washington, D.C.
lisa.miller@sidley.com
Daniel C. Craig
Chicago
dcraig@sidley.com
Asher J. Zlotnik
New York
asher.zlotnik@sidley.com
United States Announces New Cuba-Related Sanctions Program
President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order on May 1, 2026, establishing a new U.S. sanctions program targeting Cuba that supplements existing sanctions. The Order gives the U.S. Secretaries of State and Treasury the authority to impose sanctions on non-U.S. persons, including foreign financial institutions, for engaging in certain activities in Cuba or involving sanctioned Cuban persons. It thus creates significant new risks for non-U.S. persons with respect to dealings in or involving Cuba.
Maura Rezendes
Washington, D.C.
maura.rezendes@sidley.com
Jen Fernandez
Washington, D.C.
jen.fernandez@sidley.com
Andrew W. Shoyer
Washington, D.C.
ashoyer@sidley.com
Ben Vallimarescu
Washington, D.C.
ben.vallimarescu@sidley.com
James Daher
Washington, D.C.
james.daher@sidley.com
Lloyd Lyall
Washington, D.C.
lloyd.lyall@sidley.com
Mine Orer
Washington, D.C.
morer@sidley.com
The First Prediction Market Insider Trading Case: SDNY and CFTC Test the Limits of Fraud and Commodities Law
On April 23, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) announced parallel criminal and civil actions against a U.S. Army service member accused of using classified military information about a planned operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to place profitable trades on Polymarket, a prediction market platform. The case, the first to apply traditional insider trading and fraud theories to prediction markets, signals a shift in how the government will regulate this emerging market. In response to this news, companies should consider reviewing company policies on insider trading and compliance to address prediction markets and the use of confidential information in connection with event-based trading.
Matthew Podolsky
New York
matthew.podolsky@sidley.com
Ian McGinley
New York
ian.mcginley@sidley.com
Michael D. Mann
New York
mdmann@sidley.com
Hao Zhu
Washington, D.C.
hao.zhu@sidley.com
Jessica Martinez
Boston
jessica.martinez@sidley.com
DOJ’s FOCUS Initiative: An Invitation or a Warning to Data Miner Relators?
On April 30, 2026, the Department of Justice’s Civil Division announced the Fraud Oversight through Careful Use of Statistics, or FOCUS, initiative. The initiative is aimed at a fast-growing category of False Claims Act relators that exploded in the aftermath of the pandemic and the Paycheck Protection Program: “data miners” who analyze publicly available government data to identify potential fraud and then file qui tam complaints. DOJ’s message to these non-traditional relators is twofold. First, the Department seems to have accepted that data-miner relators are here to stay, and so has invited sophisticated, well-supported data analysis that can help identify fraud that might otherwise go undetected. But second, DOJ intends to prioritize data-miner relators who can demonstrate meaningful pre-filing diligence, analytical rigor, familiarity with the governing program rules, and legally sufficient allegations.
For companies in sectors with substantial government funding or reimbursement, including healthcare, life sciences, defense, education, technology, and other government contractors, the practical takeaway is straightforward. Companies should evaluate their own publicly available data with the same skepticism and sophistication that a relator, short seller, or agency analyst might apply. Leveraging enhanced analytics and AI to match and front-run potential data miner-driven qui tams will allow companies to quickly assess the likely source of government interest, and explain it.
Michael D. Mann
New York
mdmann@sidley.com
Kenneth G. Coffin
Dallas
kenneth.coffin@sidley.com
Hao Zhu
Washington, D.C.
hao.zhu@sidley.com
Jessica Martinez
Boston
jessica.martinez@sidley.com
Ninth Circuit Vacates Insider Trading Conviction Over Court’s Failure to Investigate Juror Bias
On April 21, 2026, a Ninth Circuit panel vacated an insider trading conviction in United States v. Bolandian, holding that the trial court failed to properly investigate a juror who admitted he was “not sure” he could remain impartial. The case involved a Los Angeles trader accused of profiting from confidential merger tips, resulting in a conviction and 24-month sentence. But on appeal, the court found plain error in allowing the uncertain juror—who ultimately served as foreperson—to remain without further inquiry. Emphasizing the court’s independent duty to ensure juror impartiality, the decision underscores that even without a defense objection, unresolved bias concerns can mandate a new trial—offering both a cautionary note and a safeguard for defense counsel.
Lisa H. Miller
Washington, D.C.
lisa.miller@sidley.com
Mallory W. Edel
New York
medel@sidley.com
Tyler Baylis
San Francisco
tbaylis@sidley.com
Lauren T. Dehn
San Francisco
ldehn@sidley.com
Categories
Archives
Meet the Team
Douglas A. Axel
daxel@sidley.com
David H. Hoffman
david.hoffman@sidley.com
Joan M. Loughnane
jloughnane@sidley.com
Kenneth A. Polite Jr.
kpolite@sidley.com
Daniel D. Rubinstein
drubinstein@sidley.com
Yuet Ming Tham
ytham@sidley.com
Dave Anderson
dlanderson@sidley.com
Sheila A.G. Armbrust
sarmbrust@sidley.com
Ellyce R. Cooper
ecooper@sidley.com
Daniel C. Craig
dcraig@sidley.com
Alexandria Daugherty
adaugherty@sidley.com
Craig Francis Dukin
cdukin@sidley.com
Sara George
sara.george@sidley.com
Shu Min Ho
shumin.ho@sidley.com
Naomi A. Igra
naomi.igra@sidley.com
Kristin Graham Koehler
kkoehler@sidley.com
Scott R. Lassar
slassar@sidley.com
Michael A. Levy
mlevy@sidley.com
Geeta Malhotra
gmalhotra@sidley.com
Michael D. Mann
mdmann@sidley.com
Ian McGinley
ian.mcginley@sidley.com
Lisa H. Miller
lisa.miller@sidley.com
Paige Holden Montgomery
pmontgomery@sidley.com
Julia G. Mirabella
jmirabella@sidley.com
Takayuki Ono
tono@sidley.com
Matthew Podolsky
matthew.podolsky@sidley.com
Alexa Poletto
apoletto@sidley.com
Karen A. Popp
kpopp@sidley.com
Jacqueline Pruitt
jpruitt@sidley.com
Doreen M. Rachal
drachal@sidley.com
Kevin Rubino
krubino@sidley.com
Leslie A. Shubert
lshubert@sidley.com
David A. Silva
david.silva@sidley.com
Michele Tagliaferri
mtagliaferri@sidley.com
Frank R. Volpe
fvolpe@sidley.com
Marisa S. West
marisa.west@sidley.com
Angela M. Xenakis
axenakis@sidley.com
Kenneth G. Coffin
kenneth.coffin@sidley.com