Three Potential Benefits, One Powerful Incentive: NDIL’s New Individual Self-Disclosure Program
On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois (NDIL) announced a new Individual Self-Disclosure Program offering qualifying individuals three potential forms of relief in exchange for voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation: letter immunity, a deferred or non-prosecution agreement, or criminal prosecution with substantial sentencing relief. The Program’s express three-tier structure distinguishes it from many other federal self-disclosure programs, which generally focus on the possibility of a non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreement. To qualify, individuals must provide a complete and truthful proffer, cooperate fully with law enforcement, testify if required, and disgorge any criminal proceeds, among other requirements. This post summarizes the Program’s key features and highlights how it compares to similar self-disclosure initiatives adopted in other jurisdictions.
When “The Devil Made Me Do It” Is Not a Defense: Lessons in AI Governance and Organizational Oversight from an SDNY Decision
As companies increasingly integrate generative and agentic AI into core business functions, a May 7, 2026 decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York1 highlights several fundamental guardrails for corporate legal and compliance departments to consider. Although the case arose in the context of government decision-making, the opinion carries broader implications for any entity that embeds generative AI in its processes.
“Don’t Wait”: DOJ Criminal Division Chief Signals Faster Disclosure Expectations and Uptick in Corporate Enforcement
On May 7, 2026, Assistant Attorney General A. Tysen Duva used his first major speech to the compliance community since DOJ’s March 2026 rollout of its department-wide Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) to deliver a clear message: corporate enforcement activity is expected to increase, companies should self-disclose misconduct early—even before completing internal investigations—and robust compliance programs remain central to DOJ’s expectations.
FinCEN, Office of Foreign Assets Control Propose Anti-Money-Laundering Program and Sanctions Requirements for Stablecoin Issuers
The U.S. Department of the Treasury, through the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) (collectively Treasury) issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking on April 8, 2026, to implement the anti-money-laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance provisions of the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act), establishing a regulatory framework for permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs), hereinafter collectively “the proposed rule.”[1] The proposed rule does not address the GENIUS Act’s customer identification program (CIP) requirements, which are expected to be the subject of a separate rulemaking.
The New UK Corporate Offence of Failure to Prevent Fraud
The fraud landscape in the UK is changing, and it will become much easier to prosecute organisations for fraudulent offences.
In September 2025, the UK’s new corporate “failure to prevent fraud” offence introduced under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (Act), will come into force. This marks a key step in the UK government’s intention to bring about a corporate-culture shift around fraud prevention, encouraging organisations to take proactive measures to prevent fraud.
